<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Someone Say Stimulus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/22/did-someone-say-stimulus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/2009/10/22/did-someone-say-stimulus/</link>
	<description>Business Ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Georg</title>
		<link>http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/2009/10/22/did-someone-say-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Georg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/?p=229#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Morissa,

An excellent overview of our present economic situation.  Like the $5,600 approach to our citizens who deserve home aid rather than the US providing foreign aid which never gets to the intended targets.

What also is necessary is to fight our terrorist war militarily and not politically.  We must remove the rules of engagement and when necessary retaliate with extreme force killing all who are involved or who act as suppliers to the enemy.  If not done now we will ultimately extricate ourselves from what may be politically determined a failure (without letting the military do its work) and we will have lost those soldier&#039;s lives (5,000+) for nothing.  Let alone be considered soft to all enemies, current and potential.  We must take Patton&#039;s and Mac Arthur&#039;s stretegic approach to managing a war.  They learned from history.  We do not in DC and more potential enemies will become emboldened.  Let&#039;s get with it now.  

Nikita K knew how to beat our democracy through realizing he could win by getting us from within (the drug problem is another way to destroy the USA).  Just reflect upon what is going on now with our economy and the way we are &quot;not&quot; respected globally.  Let&#039;s talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morissa,</p>
<p>An excellent overview of our present economic situation.  Like the $5,600 approach to our citizens who deserve home aid rather than the US providing foreign aid which never gets to the intended targets.</p>
<p>What also is necessary is to fight our terrorist war militarily and not politically.  We must remove the rules of engagement and when necessary retaliate with extreme force killing all who are involved or who act as suppliers to the enemy.  If not done now we will ultimately extricate ourselves from what may be politically determined a failure (without letting the military do its work) and we will have lost those soldier&#8217;s lives (5,000+) for nothing.  Let alone be considered soft to all enemies, current and potential.  We must take Patton&#8217;s and Mac Arthur&#8217;s stretegic approach to managing a war.  They learned from history.  We do not in DC and more potential enemies will become emboldened.  Let&#8217;s get with it now.  </p>
<p>Nikita K knew how to beat our democracy through realizing he could win by getting us from within (the drug problem is another way to destroy the USA).  Just reflect upon what is going on now with our economy and the way we are &#8220;not&#8221; respected globally.  Let&#8217;s talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/2009/10/22/did-someone-say-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/?p=229#comment-165</guid>
		<description>More good points Inga. I can understand outsourcing for small business being a necessity of maintaining competitiveness, but there most certainly should be incentives to keep jobs here. There are many things that can and should be done, but as mentioned in the previous blog, this is no longer a democracy. We live in a plutocracy, and until that changes we will never see the needed reforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More good points Inga. I can understand outsourcing for small business being a necessity of maintaining competitiveness, but there most certainly should be incentives to keep jobs here. There are many things that can and should be done, but as mentioned in the previous blog, this is no longer a democracy. We live in a plutocracy, and until that changes we will never see the needed reforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inga</title>
		<link>http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/2009/10/22/did-someone-say-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Inga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/?p=229#comment-164</guid>
		<description>I guess there are a couple of ways to infuse money into the economy to get it going. However, the bottom line is, until we stop outsourcing our work around the world, we will never recover. When people work, they pay taxes. When they pay taxes, it goes to pay for various services. When we pay for services, more people are employed and pay taxes.

If you&#039;re a small business you were thrilled when no one stopped you from outsourcing software programming to india, or call center support to Brazil. Hey, you don&#039;t need to pay social security taxes on them. Look at how much money your business saved. But, it means that many more skilled Americans without work. 

What we need to do is provide incentives for businesses of all sizes to employ people HERE, so they pay taxes here (i&#039;m tired of carrying the tax burden for all of the unemployed) to support the services and education of our children. Every dollar sent to another country to pay for labor is a dollar that no longer supports our infrastructure here.

my 2 cents.

inga</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess there are a couple of ways to infuse money into the economy to get it going. However, the bottom line is, until we stop outsourcing our work around the world, we will never recover. When people work, they pay taxes. When they pay taxes, it goes to pay for various services. When we pay for services, more people are employed and pay taxes.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a small business you were thrilled when no one stopped you from outsourcing software programming to india, or call center support to Brazil. Hey, you don&#8217;t need to pay social security taxes on them. Look at how much money your business saved. But, it means that many more skilled Americans without work. </p>
<p>What we need to do is provide incentives for businesses of all sizes to employ people HERE, so they pay taxes here (i&#8217;m tired of carrying the tax burden for all of the unemployed) to support the services and education of our children. Every dollar sent to another country to pay for labor is a dollar that no longer supports our infrastructure here.</p>
<p>my 2 cents.</p>
<p>inga</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/2009/10/22/did-someone-say-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/?p=229#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Good points Lori. The problem is that there is an inherent error in a free market economy such as ours with regards to corruption and where the power lies. It is utopia on paper, but we don&#039;t live &quot;on paper.&quot; 

The other issue is that people mistake capitalism and free market with democracy. One is a form of economics and the other a form of government. There are many successful democracies that operate in mixed economies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Lori. The problem is that there is an inherent error in a free market economy such as ours with regards to corruption and where the power lies. It is utopia on paper, but we don&#8217;t live &#8220;on paper.&#8221; </p>
<p>The other issue is that people mistake capitalism and free market with democracy. One is a form of economics and the other a form of government. There are many successful democracies that operate in mixed economies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/2009/10/22/did-someone-say-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/?p=229#comment-162</guid>
		<description>I agree that we are not experiencing the vision that was sold to us on a number of occasions during Bush and Obama (who inherited the problem...).  My theory is that the $600 check was received by the public, but it was not received with the intended result.  why? an inherent distrust of the administration and &#039;the man&#039; as of late.  Folks have no confidence in the government as it is.  Yes, this was a fine excuse to attempt the trickle down theory of economics, and on paper it should work...  unfortunately, we have humans working the administration of it all...  

The Bailouts were a mistake from the beginning...  It sends the message to those misbehaving that they can continue to misbehave and still receive sustenance.  what message are we sending here, people?  Stimulus?  Bailouts? Top Down, Bottom Up?  What is it really, to have a free market?  Does it truly include the World Bank and the IMF?  So many question, so many theories, so few answers that would satisfy a global economy working towards world democratization.

Trickle Up may work, but I fear that it may be a case of too little too late.  The world is in a loan/repay/restrictions cycle and it is a merry-go-round that is never ending. The IMF has tried a failed experiment.  Lets allow for real market competition, and see where the profits land.

Just simple thoughts from the dark side... at the end of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we are not experiencing the vision that was sold to us on a number of occasions during Bush and Obama (who inherited the problem&#8230;).  My theory is that the $600 check was received by the public, but it was not received with the intended result.  why? an inherent distrust of the administration and &#8216;the man&#8217; as of late.  Folks have no confidence in the government as it is.  Yes, this was a fine excuse to attempt the trickle down theory of economics, and on paper it should work&#8230;  unfortunately, we have humans working the administration of it all&#8230;  </p>
<p>The Bailouts were a mistake from the beginning&#8230;  It sends the message to those misbehaving that they can continue to misbehave and still receive sustenance.  what message are we sending here, people?  Stimulus?  Bailouts? Top Down, Bottom Up?  What is it really, to have a free market?  Does it truly include the World Bank and the IMF?  So many question, so many theories, so few answers that would satisfy a global economy working towards world democratization.</p>
<p>Trickle Up may work, but I fear that it may be a case of too little too late.  The world is in a loan/repay/restrictions cycle and it is a merry-go-round that is never ending. The IMF has tried a failed experiment.  Lets allow for real market competition, and see where the profits land.</p>
<p>Just simple thoughts from the dark side&#8230; at the end of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Derbinshire</title>
		<link>http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/2009/10/22/did-someone-say-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Derbinshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pawlconsulting.com/blog/?p=229#comment-161</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading along for a while now.  I just wanted to drop you a comment to say keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading along for a while now.  I just wanted to drop you a comment to say keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
